Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘opinion’

By: Mamata Tharima
Montgazette Staff Writer

September 11th and the media’s coverage of radical Muslim activities lead some anti-Muslim protestors to publicly burn copies of the Quran and vandalize
mosques to show their hatred for Muslims worldwide. On top of this, the media continues to focus on critical stereotypes of Muslims and documenting violations of
their rights. The controversial and misused term of Jihad is one of the roots of this hatred. This Arabic word means “struggle or strive for a noble cause with determination without causing any harm.” Many non-Muslims use the word Jihad to mean “Holy War,” which was first used to describe the Christian Crusades from the ninth to twelfth centuries. “The misuse of Jihad contradicts Islam,” Shaykh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani, Chairman of the Islamic Supreme Council of America writes in his article “Jihad: A Misunderstood Concept from Islam – What Jihad is, and is not.” Shaykh Kabbani points out that the Quran and Islamic law do not define Jihad as just killing. The concept of Jihad has been hijacked by many political and religious extremists to commit violence and terror against many innocent people. According to Cosmas Akuta, a communication professor at Montgomery County Community College, “We should not require people in terms of proselytizing or get people in your religion to do evils whether in deeds or speech…I think we should use religion for good and to uplift people.” The media and news channels cover stories that interest them and appeal to a mainstream audience but sometimes the coverage can be biased. In 2015, there was a shooting of three young Muslims in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. All of them were shot in the head by their neighbor who was an atheist and made antiIslamic statements on social media. The parents of the victims reported that their children were harassed because of their appearance and felt threatened by their neighbor on multiple occasions. Several organizations, educational institutions and interfaith services, taking full advantage of the freedoms from the United States Constitution, express brotherhood and respect of Muslims. Julie Sullivan, the president of St. Thomas University, a Catholic university in Minnesota, offered a statement of support for Muslim students and staff. She said, “At a time of deeply troubling anti-Muslim political rhetoric in American society, we at the University of St. Thomas reiterate our welcome to Muslims as members of our community, our gratitude for the many contributions that Muslims make to our community and our unwavering support especially for our many Muslim students.”
President Barack Obama visited a mosque in Baltimore, Maryland to send a strong message of support to Muslim-Americans and to defend religious freedom in America. In his speech, he said, “If we are serious about freedom of religion—and I am speaking now to my fellow Christians who remain the majority in this country—we have to understand an attack on one faith is an attack on all our faiths.” We as humans should continue to work collaboratively to fight against violence and terrorism to make the world a better place to live in harmony with one another.

article photo for newspaper

Mamata Tharima Courtesy of the author.

Read Full Post »

By: Nicholas Ayres
Montgazette Contributing Writer

To make it anywhere in the media
business, you’ve got to sell your
content by broadcasting on the most
popular places to get viewers. One the
most popular websites with the best
quality that has changed the media
industry and is nearly guaranteed to
attract the most viewers is YouTube.
But has YouTube gotten too big to be
worth the bother?
Most of the time, posting a video
elsewhere, especially to content
creators with small wallets, will get
minimal views. By posting content
on YouTube, content creators have
a better chance of viewers finding
the content and content creators can
latch onto Google Ads to generate
some revenue.
YouTube, especially since
Google bought it out in 2006, has
grown to an immense size. With
its attachment to Google and its
never-ending popularity, YouTube
has reached a monopoly-like status.
They have no serious competition,
allowing them to control the digital
video content market.
YouTube’s size has many
drawbacks. For every high quality
video, there are at least 50 more
videos of obviously inferior visual
quality. It is estimated that anywhere
from 300-500 hours are uploaded to
YouTube every minute.
Another downside is that content
creators don’t need to make impressive
videos to profit off of the service. A
sizable number of YouTubers make
money off of simple reaction videos,
playing back video games with audio
commentary or harmful prank videos.
On top of this is the problem of
YouTube’s preset programming and
video suggesting system encouraging
these type of videos.
YouTube’s “elephant in the room”
is a system they call Content ID. With
this, YouTube content creators who
post their production can be flagged
with Digital Millennium Copyright
Act, a content protection law signed
in 1999, infringement and make zero
revenue from their work.
Someone can flag another
YouTuber’s video even if the content
falls under the Fair Use Doctrine, a
law intended to balance the interests
of copyright holders with the public
interest in the wider distribution of
media. After being flagged, content
creators have to wait a month or
longer until the DMCA infringement
is released. In many cases by that
time, it’s way too late to make any
sort of profit.
With these and many other
roadblocks, YouTube is fast becoming
what content creators never wanted it
be: Bad for broadcasting.

Read Full Post »

By: Dave Aston
Montgazette Staff Writer

Fanboys and fangirls of The
Hunger Games rejoice and shed a
tear. Rejoice for an amazing thrill
ride to the end wrap-up to last year’s
disappointing Mockingjay, Part 1.
Shed a tear realizing the only way
we get to relive the world of Suzanne
Collins’ Panem is in the books and the
forth-coming four-disc boxed set. I
hope.
With obsessive precision,
Mockingjay Part 2, which came out
on November 20, 2015, follows the
last half of the book, including most of
the dialogue, albeit slowly. Starting off
where Part 1 ended, Katniss Everdeen,
reprised by Academy-award winner
Jennifer Lawrence, finishes off her
duties as the Mockingjay.
Once the physical wounds of
her attack by Peeta, astoundingly
portrayed by Josh Hutcherson, heal,
Katniss tries to convince Peeta that
she’s no monster and the rebel cause
is worth fighting for. Unfortunately,
Peeta is so badly scarred that Katniss
marches off to the District Two to
break the Capitol’s last stronghold and
forget about Peeta.
Once District Two is free of
Capitol rule, President Coin, played
by Julianne Moore, considers Katniss
of no more value now that the districts
are united.
Determined to prove her worth,
and that the movie is sort-of separate
from the books, Katniss goes off
to final battleground: The Capitol.
Unlike the books plausible transition
of Katniss the Symbol to Katniss the
Soldier, the movie has her, in broad
daylight sneak off to the Capitol on
a medical transport. Once there,
despite being surrounded by rebels
and soldiers who know her familiar
face, she walks right into a new
fighting squad and is reunited with
Liam Hemsworth’s Gale Hawthorne
and Sam Claffin’s Finnick Odair.
Without any the formal military
training she received in the book,
Katniss becomes a soldier faster than
you can steep a cup of tea. Nonetheless,
Katniss and this new squad are given
orders by President Coin that they
are to be used for propaganda filming
purposes only.
True to irony and the book, the
story finally begins to speed up when
Katniss and friends fall into several
series of traps designed by her mortal
enemy President Snow, perfectly
presented by Donald Sutherland, to
kill her before she kills him.
After avoiding all the traps and
watching all but Peeta, Gale and two
others die, Katniss finds herself just
yards from Snow’s presidential palace.
But between her and Snow are a
series of barricades. The innermost
barricade houses the Capitol children,
seemingly safe from the incoming
rebel soldiers.
As Katniss reaches the barrier, a
hovercraft flies overhead delivering
what appear to be gifts for the kids.
Just as they land, they explode.
Within seconds, the barricades are
removed and amidst the Capitol
soldiers and rebel medics rushing
in to help, Katniss spots her sister,
Prim, played the future teen acting
superstar Willow Shields.
Just as Katniss and Prim look at
each other, the rest of the gifts explode.
“Mockingjay Part 2” is every bit the
thrill ride of the book’s second half
of what I consider is Suzanne Collins’
magnum opus.
What seals the deal for this
don’t-you-dare-blink adventure
for me is the very end of the
film. Like the book, we see the
epilogue of the Katniss and
Peeta saga where the two marry
and decide to have children. As
the film closes, with me holding
back every tear, Katniss utters,
nearly verbatim, the final lines
of Mockingjay, the book.
My fanboy rating is 4.5 out
of 5 stars. Realistically, because
of a slow start, it’s still a solid 4
out of 5. Go watch it or, better
yet, create your mental tour-deforce
by reading the books.

hunger games poster

Read Full Post »

By: Joshua Kellem
Montgazette Staff Writer

The game of journalists versus the Internet is a good
one. The end of the game seems near and the winner will
earn the trophy of relevance. But a solid strategy from the
newspaper companies to restrict Internet access to their
articles may just cost them the game.
Newspapers offer content online as a paid subscription.
This has been a discouragement to many as newspaper
subscriptions are still in decline. The newspaper companies
can shift the game in their favor by using the Internet’s
formula: use ads in the online articles.
The Internet provides a greater volume of news and
comes out instantly, unlike a newspaper. Internet news sites
use advertising and sponsors promotions, to make money.
But how does this keep either the newspaper or the news
websites relevant?
Larry Atkins, journalist, lawyer and professor at
Montgomery County Community College, said, “The
relevance of newspapers depends on which people you
survey. To young people, print newspapers are not part of
their lives. They rely on social media. [But] to older people
newspapers are still important.”
Atkins is one of many journalists who believes the
Internet is good for journalism and its relevance to society.
“I don’t think traditional journalism will ever go away. People
need to be
informed. [So] the journalism profession is evolving.
Breaking news, traditional journalism has tied the game
on the last play of the fourth quarter, the game is headed
into overtime. It looks like only time will decide this winner

Read Full Post »

By: Joshua Kellem
Montgazette Staff Writer

Many journalists say the internet
amplifies journalism. No matter how
news is consumed, all journalism should
be produced in a way that does not drive
down the value of content. The underlying
question—is there still ethics in journalism?
In 2015, the journalism game has
changed. There are fewer newspapers
being printed because the content and
consumers eyes are going onto the internet.
More and more stories are being
broken on the internet and on social media.
Anchors and reporters on television now
have a presence on Facebook, Twitter and
Instagram, just to name a few social media
platforms. The big stories of the day are
being broken through these platforms.
Some stories are even being brought to
reporters by everyday citizens. In a sense,
social media is the Wikipedia of journalism
in 2015.
With this added pressure to break
stories on social media, can journalists
balance not rushing a story, which leads to
the risk of credibility, and delivering the
most accurate content quickly?
Matthew Herper, of Forbes.com, wrote
an article of CNN’s “Reliable Sources” host
Howard Kurtz’s show discussing Steve
Jobs’ third leave of absence in 2011. Some
of Kurtz’s guest argued that covering news
on Jobs during his leave was unethical as
there was a gray area on whether or not
Jobs, CEO of Apple, was a public figure.
In the mind of a journalist, like Kurtz, it
was just another story because Jobs was at
the very least a person people cared about.
Many journalists covering Jobs’ leave of
absence thought they were appeasing
readers, but to their advertising sponsors
some believe that they were trying to
increase pageviews.
On the other side of the coin, The
Baltimore Sun staff writer Susan Reimer
wrote an article about how USA Today
defended their inquiry of star tennis player
Arthur Ashe and the possibility of him
having AIDS. Unlike with Jobs, there was
no doubt that Ashe was a public figure.
The logic that you can’t cover Jobs
being sick because he’s not a public figure
and you can’t cover Ashe even though he
is a public figure but sick might be the
biggest contradiction of all time. This is
where the journalist has to lead the people
and not the other way around.
To many news outlets, covering Jobs
was the people leading the journalist. Now,
the people complain about the journalist
covering celebrities too much.
The journalist, for the saneness of
journalism, must lead. The people tried to
get USA Today to back off by frowning
upon what they were doing to Ashe at the
time, but the USA Today just kept going.
What USA Today did was completely
ethical and good for journalism as it is the
people’s right to know what’s going on.
Too many “the people” usages and too
much action ascribed to newspapers
Are there still ethics in journalism?
Yes, you just have to look for it.

Read Full Post »

Joshua Kellem

Montgazette Staff Writer

I have traveled around the news to find political bias. First stop: The 2016 presidential election coverage of Donald Trump.

In, 2015, he spoke at a protest for the Iran nuclear deal. Trump repeatedly bashed President Obama with no interruption from his public relations people. At first, Trump declared, “This deal and the people who agreed on it are incumbent.” Trump then goes on to say, “The deal is a disgrace.”

Hold on, ladies and gentlemen. The best part of his speech came as Trump exclaimed, “They [Iran] have suckered us. They have taken advantage of stupid people.”

The news report and the anchor didn’t add any opinions, but the way the story was reported was sided in favor of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Next up, CBS’s coverage of what some people in Iowa called the “China factor.” The news is shown without the lead anchor expressing his opinion but it was not objective.

The so-called “China factor” came from Iowa exporting two-hundred million soybeans to China every year. China, however, was thinking about growing their own soybeans, leaving a big hole in Iowa’s economy. This problem was so prominent that Donald Trump, yes Donald Trump, stated, “I’m not going to let China rip us off.”

Third was the coverage from MSNBC’s “Hardball with Chris Matthews” also regarding the Iran nuclear deal protests. A show known for its liberal spin, none of the coverage was done about President Obama.

Contrary to CBS’s national news, Chris Matthews spoke upfor the President. Matthews called the people who spoke at the rally the “Usual Suspects,” composed of former Vice-President Dick Cheyney and political pundits Scooter Libby, John Bolton , and Paul Wolfowitz. About this group of men, Matthews said they’re, “Back together for another big war fest. Cheering American boys to the front from the safety of the op-ed pages.”

Matthews then showed Texas Senator, Ted Cruz, speaking. Cruz said, “If this deal goes through, we know to an absolute certainty people will die.” Matthews wasted no time attacking Cruz’s statement. “Last time, Cruz was certain of anything was the Iraq war that cost the lives of two hundred-thousand, including four thousand Americans.”

During the rally, Donald Trump, returned saying, “We will have so much winning, if I get elected, that you may get bored of winning.”

Matthews interrupted Trump’s words. “Getting a little tired, isn’t it?”

News and news hosts are not completely objective, because there is always some bias. In the end, whether Donald Trump’s mouth gets into the White House is up to you.

Read Full Post »